“Court’s decision is not a religious text, which should not be amended”, Supreme Court 1

[ad_1]

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has said that the decision of the court is not like a religious text which cannot be amended or corrected. The Supreme Court has said that the verdict is not a resting place but a step. Justice Arun Mishra made these remarks while refusing to separate himself from the five-member bench in the land acquisition compensation case. Justice Mishra, in his larger order, said that it would be a big mistake for him to withdraw the hearing in the case, as the other four members of the bench also believe that Judge Mishra cannot be disqualified from hearing the case.

In its judgment, the apex court has said that just because a judge should not have been joined by a larger bench that he has expressed his opinion on that issue through a judgment earlier, it should not be a ground for exclusion from the hearing. can. If this happens, no judge will be able to attend reconsideration, corrective or reference sent to a larger bench. At the same time, the Constitution Bench has also said in its judgment that there will be no judge in the Supreme Court who would not have given any opinion in the past regarding Section 24 of the Land Acquisition Act.

He said that no judge will have the right to hear the issue at the judicial level if the petitioner’s demand for separation of a judge from the hearing has been accepted. The bench said that every day we go through the same provision or some different provision. In such a case, any consideration taken by the judge in the past cannot be grounds for exclusion from the hearing.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has said that the decision of the court is not like a religious text which cannot be amended or corrected. The Supreme Court has said that the verdict is not a resting place but a step. Justice Arun Mishra made these remarks while refusing to separate himself from the five-member bench in the land acquisition compensation case. Justice Mishra, in his larger order, said that it would be a big mistake for him to withdraw the hearing in the case, as the other four members of the bench also believe that Judge Mishra cannot be disqualified from hearing the case.

In its judgment, the apex court has said that just because a judge should not have been joined by a larger bench that he has expressed his opinion on that issue through a judgment earlier, it should not be a ground for exclusion from the hearing. can. If this happens, no judge will be able to attend reconsideration, corrective or reference sent to a larger bench. At the same time, the Constitution Bench has also said in its judgment that there will be no judge in the Supreme Court who would not have given any opinion in the past regarding Section 24 of the Land Acquisition Act.

He said that no judge will have the right to hear the issue at the judicial level if the petitioner’s demand for separation of a judge from the hearing has been accepted. The bench said that every day we go through the same provision or some different provision. In such a case, any consideration taken by the judge in the past cannot be grounds for exclusion from the hearing.



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *